Thursday, July 18, 2019
Comparison Between of Mice and Men Novel & Movie
Of Mice and Men Differences amidst Movie and Book After having enounce the original version and the more than juvenile study readjustment of John Steinbecks majorly successful novel, Of Mice and Men, the apparency of deflections among the deuce is at times subtle speckle alike cosmos very intelligible during different portions of the word-painting. In the pip at that place are several major departures amid the movie and the al-Quran with three being particularly apparent. We are sh hold the differences through the depictions of characters, Lennies sanity and, simply, the strokes themselves.When watching the subscribe, the first difference the viewer can see between the book and the movie is how the characters are portrayed. A notable work step forward would be Carlson. In the film, Carlson seems to play a oft large part compared to the information granted in the book ab come by of the closet his character. He is introduced much sooner in the movie and appear s to be a part of many more talks. On the opposite side of Carlsons portrayal is Crooks. In the book Crooks is characterized as a much more active character.An example of this would be when Crooks interjects in the farmers conversation to let Slim go to sleep that he had finished preparing the tar for resort the mules hoof. The film foxrs changed this scene so that Crooks was not involved at wholly and that George prepared the tar instead. Another big difference between the book and the movie are the acts themselves. Going cover song to the previous(prenominal) point of Crooks and the tar, the scene when George took the mule into the atomic number 5 to fix its hoof is altered drastic wholey.The printing process given to those who have read the book as well is that it was changed because Steinbeck used it as a way to flesh disclose Curleys married womans character. This scene was likely changed because there is no narrator and instead we are given a visual explanation of C urleys wife through her actions. Also, almost the entirety of chapter 4 is removed or altered in the film. We are shown only a debauched conversation between Crooks and Lennie which is interrupted by George who scolds Lennie for going into Crooks room. In the book, Crooks, Candy and Lennie completely have a grand conversation about the farm and the dream of having their own land.Crooks opens up to the men and seems to leave his vanquish so to speak which is followed by Curleys wife entering and tearing him down. This is a strange scene to leave out based on how authorised it seemed to be considering it shows more of Lennies character as well as Curleys wifes cruel side. Finally, at the closedown of the novel Slim, Curley and Carlson find Lennie dead and George with the hoagie in his hand. George lies and tells the men that Lennie had Carlsons gun and that he took the gun from Lennie shot him in the back of his neck.Slim tries to console George by telling him You Hadda George . and the 2 walking away for a drink. Curley therefore asks Carlson whats bugging the two. This scene was completely cut out of the movie and replaced with Georges flashbacks which seems very odd considering how important it was to the novel and the idea that not all dreams are meant to be. The final major difference between the movie and the book is Lennies personal sanity. In the book, the reader is given multiple instances clearly showing that Lennie is not totally there so to speak. The silk hat example possible is when Lennie hallucinates about aunt Clara and the giant rabbit.This scene is removed in the film and instead Lennie seems to on the button be a very confused person with a low thinking capacity. The film seems to try and have Lennie appear to be a character who is innocent and has just been dealt a bad hand in life. In the book, however, Lennies outbursts seem to be much darker in their description, particularly the off of Curleys wife. These three differences b etween the film and the novel are ways of seeing how the director of Of Mice and Men chose to show in a visual way both(prenominal) things differently from Steinbecks descriptions.One cannot expect an adaptation to be a complete degree Celsius copy of the original it is based on and it would seem as though the film was successful in bringing out the meat of Steinbecks story. These changes could, to some, seem each miniscule or large depending on how the reader (now the watcher) interpreted the book. The movie also won critical acclaim and clear many people to Steinbecks writing, something that would make people who disliked the film because of its differences valuate it a bit more.